Skip to main content

Understanding the 'Defination' of Internet Trolling

A recent controversial article by Chetan Bhagat tried to highlight a moot point of how the Bhakts (as the Narendra Modi supports are called on internet) are sexually frustrated, male egoist and are people with no proper English dialect (which might summarize the last three characters in his books or any Bollywood film for that matter). But while his observations are completely without any research (as are his flat stories or half-cooked Bollywood plot boilers) the main purpose of this article to set the record straight.

Lets look at the facts without any masala added to it. Since the dawn of internet there were trolls who loved to seek attention. They first started email marketing sending countless emails about the exclusive offer they had. But as technology grew closer we brought all sorts of people together and with them we brought these trolls near us. This is a global phenomena and not limited to India.

A definition of an internet troll by Wikipedia is as follows

In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
Based on this definition I am a bit confused regarding Mr. Bhagat claim about Bhakts being internet trolls.The purpose of the article by Mr. Bhagat was to sow discord on the internet by starting arguments or upsetting people by posting inflammatory or off-topic messages in an online community. If we understand the definition correctly, Mr. Bhagat is the troll in the whole episode who is doing what every accused person does, blaming the whole world for his problems.

But let's take a step back and look into the interesting topic that internet was debating a while back. Mrs. Shruti Seth posted something inflammatory and off-topic message during the #SelfieWithDaughter campaign and faced the ire of the same Bhakts (mentioned above). Obviously, she played the victim card and went above and beyond to teach the whole world a lesson. She was applauded by a few known people who love to discuss the issue in fluent English over cocktail dresses and evening gowns. But again if we look at the definition above, she was the troll in the whole episode.

What was missing in Mr. Bhagat article (and perhaps in his books as well) is the understanding of the bigger picture. What is missing in all our discussions is that - people are frustrated, yes. They are frustrated of living in a third world country with the third rate infrastructure despite being the worlds largest producer of engineering students. They are frustrated because despite working for twelve hours in a day, they cannot get proper peace and quiet that they deserve. They are frustrated that despite they paying all their taxes on time, the garbage in front of their doors just piles up. But not all of these frustrated people become Bhakts as Mr. Bhagat would like to see.

Some of these frustrated people leave India in search of greener pastures. Others are either waiting for that opportune moment or letting the frustration vent out on the internet. But then something changes, a lot of unforeseen (or perhaps foreseen) changes happen. A leader appears and captures the imagination of these frustrated people. Yes, he is a Hindu right wing leader but he does not speak religion, he speaks to them to their frustration and to their problem. They are the so-called Bhakts we love to hate. But some of them are still not convinced. Another young leader follows him and he manages to capture the imagination of few. He has no credentials but he speaks to a subset of the Bhakts, these people are called AAPTards on the internet (both the terms are not coined by me and merely used as a reference). What Mr. Bhagat missed in the article or for that matter a lot of the other so-called columns missed was that - this was democracy at its best.

Today in a country of 51% young adults workforce, majority of them are actively taking part in discussions surrounding their elected leaders. In a country where a few decades ago there was a mere 51% of voting, today we are having almost 70-80-90% of participation in elections. What Rajdeep Sardesai learnt in Madison Square park was something we all should learn- this is a new India that we are witnessing. This is the worlds largest democracy waking up having active discussions around their future and about their past. They are trying to identify themselves to their roots (be it connecting with being Hindu or Hindi).

We are amidst the biggest change this democracy has witnessed, it will have its repercussions. Some people will have problem (change is always unpleasant) and India will change - for good or for bad, only time can tell. But amidst all this chaos there is one thing keeping them all- the bhakts and the AppTards and the other frustrated Indians- glued together and that is hope.

Hope is never bad. Is it?

When someone like Mr. Bhagat or Mrs. Shruti Seth tries to upset the sanctity of their hope. They get upset and they respond in the only way their are taught. It might not be pleasant or rosy or mature. The responses may be wrong but their intent is not. The intent springs from a new-found hope that they are trying to hold onto amidst the frustrations.

Finally it is not they who are trolling anyone, they are responding. Those who try to upset them by posting inflammatory and disturbing comments might want to rethink, who is the real victim here?


Post a Comment

What do you think about the post? Have your say, like, dislike or even hate me. Tell me.

You might also want to Subscribe to RSS feeds or follow me on Twitter (@sidoscope) or on facebook

I don't need weapon, I have a sharp tongue.

Popular posts from this blog

The moaning of life #2 Childhood Trauma

The entire shark family is out for a hunt, and the little fish are running for their life. We get to cheer as the Baby Shark does Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo with his family, calling on the family - extended family and sometimes robots on the 'hunt' because your offspring decides that that is the one song they want you to play or a tantrum follows. Many of you will say it's not the content but the catchy tune that draws the babies towards the nonsequential song, but it's more than that. It's the sheer repeatedness that draws your angst towards the piece. And YouTube provides the music based on how much time you want your baby to be engaged to it. You have a 60+ minute version and a 120+ minute version. The same shark family going out on the same hunt. And it's not just the Shark family. Weirdly, baby JJ and his family sing random songs, go on a holiday and even increase the family. I am talking about Cocomelon, which has arrived in your child's life as he murmurs t

Short Story: Ginger Chai

This is my first attempt for writing a love story, which I am really bad at. Mani Padma (from Ginger Chai ) challenged me to write a love story a few days ago, it is not a real great read, but a little feeble attempt to take a taste in this genre. Please give your honest opinion… Cheers, Sid. *fingers crossed* Breathe in. Breathe out. Damm, this is so easy when you are not tensed. Why is this clerk talking so much time. ‘Will you hurry up?’ I asked the clerk. My finger nails were tapping the counter in excitement. My name is Shailaja, 30, single and employed, in short a perfect girl for the aunties, mammies to constantly remind me that my days are waning out, that I have to find someone before it is impossible for them to. It is not that I don’t want to get married, but I should get some proper match, isn’t it? All they show me is either short, tall, long nose, meaning some imperfection in some way or the other. I am not at all hopeless romantic and I am definitely not goin

We used to build civilizations. Now we build shopping malls.

The human evolution is a constant race against boredom, men have for generations tried to overcome boredom is many ways possible. In olden days, they got bored, they build civilizations, big massive civilizations. The ancient Egyptians had pyramids, the Babylon build the hanging garden for people to hang out. People from far and wide come to visit the Taj Mahal, praising its divine beauty, not knowing that it was build after the wife died, thus partly in guilt. Rome was not build in a day, indication they were super bored. Then came the great barbarian evolution and they started raiding cities. Don't forget Atila the Hun who constantly attacked cities whenever he got free time. Alexander was super bored and he decided to conquer the entire world, but while these men where attacking cities and building civilizations, the women where thrown into a abyss of impending boredom. What would Mrs. Atila do when her husband was busy attacking Rome? Or What would the wives of the